OpenCode

The OpenCode prover is the AgentProver on the OpenCodeHarness — the OpenCode CLI driving the sorrys in a sandbox with the lean-lsp-mcp server. Unlike Claude Code and Codex, OpenCode is provider-agnostic: one CLI fronts Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, or DeepSeek, billed directly against that provider’s API. The shared Verifier does the final compile / sorry / axiom check. See Provers for the staging/diff lifecycle every agent harness shares.

Usage

from open_atp.backends.docker import DockerBackend, DockerConfig
from open_atp.images import DEFAULT_IMAGE
from open_atp.provers import AgentProver, AgentProverConfig

backend = DockerBackend(DockerConfig(image=DEFAULT_IMAGE))
config = AgentProverConfig(
    harness="opencode",
    model="claude-opus-4-8",
    effort="medium",
)
prover = AgentProver(config, verification_backend=backend)

Or by registry spec through get_prover() / the CLI: agent:opencode. The provider is inferred from the model prefix (claude-*anthropic, gpt-*openai, and so on), so any provider’s model is selected by name through the same model knob.

Harness details

configure_wd writes an opencode.json carrying the inferred provider, the model and its reasoning-effort config, and the lean-lsp MCP server, plus mounts the bundle’s skills — the host-agnostic leanprover/skills — under .agents/skills/. The MCP timeout is raised to 180 000 ms (180 s) — the first lean_diagnostic_messages call starts lake serve and loads the file’s full Mathlib import closure, which blows past the 60 s default on a cold, few-CPU sandbox. Reasoning effort maps per provider: Anthropic gets thinking: {type: "adaptive"} plus an effort output_config, while OpenAI / Google / DeepSeek get reasoningEffort. The launch script (assets/scripts/opencode_agent.sh) runs:

opencode run --dir /workspace/wd --format json \
    --model '<PROVIDER>/<MODEL>' \
    "$PROMPT"

The --format json event stream goes to stdout.

$PROMPT is the task’s instructions when set, otherwise the shared default agent prompt baked into the AgentProver:

Default agent prompt
The working directory is a complete Lean 4 lake project. One or more `.lean`
files contain `sorry` (or `admit`) placeholders standing in for proofs that have
not been written yet. Replace every such placeholder with a real proof so the
project compiles cleanly and depends on no axioms beyond Lean's standard set.

Hard rules:
- Do not weaken, rename, restate, or delete any theorem, lemma, `def`,
  `structure`, or signature. Only fill in proof bodies (the part after `:=` /
  `by` that is currently `sorry`). Changing a statement to make it easier to
  prove is failure, not success.
- No new axioms and no `sorry`/`admit`/`native_decide`-on-false escapes. The
  finished proof must type-check honestly. The only acceptable axioms are Lean's
  standard `propext`, `Classical.choice`, and `Quot.sound`.
- Stay inside this working directory; do not read or write files outside it.
- Do not edit `lakefile.toml`/`lakefile.lean`, `lean-toolchain`, or
  `lake-manifest.json` — they pin the toolchain and dependencies and must match
  the verification environment.

Workflow:
1. Find the work: search for `sorry` across the `.lean` source files (e.g.
   `rg -n '\\bsorry\\b'`). Read each file containing one to understand the
   statement, the hypotheses, and the relevant imports.
2. Confirm the lean-lsp MCP server is live before relying on it: call
   `mcp__lean-lsp__lean_diagnostic_messages` on a file you have not yet edited.
   `success:true, items:[]` means it compiles cleanly; real errors come back as
   `items`. `success:false, items:[]` usually means imports aren't built yet —
   run `lake build` for the relevant modules first.
3. Write a proof for one `sorry` at a time. Mathlib is available; prefer library
   lemmas, `simp`, `omega`, `linarith`, `exact?`/`apply?` suggestions, and
   `aesop` over long bespoke arguments.
4. After each edit, re-check that file with
   `mcp__lean-lsp__lean_diagnostic_messages` and iterate until it is clean.
5. When a file looks done, verify it has no stubbed proofs with
   `mcp__lean-lsp__lean_verify` — the reported axioms must NOT contain `sorryAx`.
6. Repeat until no `.lean` file contains a `sorry` and the whole project builds
   (`lake build`).

Tips:
- Use the lean-lsp tools (`mcp__lean-lsp__*`) as your primary feedback loop; they
  are far faster than a full `lake build` per change. Use `lake build` to
  materialize oleans for imports and as the final whole-project check.
- If a goal looks false or unprovable from the given hypotheses, re-read the
  statement: you likely misread a binder or a coercion. Do not "fix" it by
  changing the statement — finish the proof as stated.
- Non-trivial proofs routinely take many rounds of compile-error fixing. Keep
  iterating against the diagnostics rather than guessing."""

Authentication

OpenCode bills directly against an API provider rather than a flat-rate subscription. Sign up for an API account with your chosen provider, fund it, and monitor consumption from that provider’s usage dashboard — see OpenCode providers for the full list. Export the key matching your chosen provider on the host, for example:

export DEEPSEEK_API_KEY=...

The harness forwards whichever provider keys are present — ANTHROPIC_API_KEY, OPENAI_API_KEY, GOOGLE_API_KEY, DEEPSEEK_API_KEY — into the sandbox; the one matching the chosen model is used.

Cost tracking

The OpenCode CLI reports a per-step cost and token breakdown for each provider call. parse sums step_finish events — input (tokens.input plus cache write/read), output (tokens.output), and cost — into cost_usd in HarnessRunResult, so cost comes straight from the provider via OpenCode.